Miguel-Angel Lopez Jaen vs Niels Desein Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L W L W L L L W W
Form
L W W L L W W L L LHead To Head: Jaen 2 - 0 Desein
They have played 5 sets in total, with Jaen winning 4 and Desein winning 1. The last match between Jaen and Desein was at the Kosice Challenger, 09-06-2009, First, Clay with Miguel-Angel Lopez Jaen getting the victory 6-4 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Miguel-Angel Lopez Jaen | 2 |
| Niels Desein | 0 |
Kosice Challenger(09-06-2009)
6
4
6
1
| Jaen | Stats | Desein |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| Ret. | Ranking | Ret. |
| 171 | Highest Rank | 154 |
| 42 | Age | 37 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 7 | Titles | 27 |
| 54% (331-281) | Career Total W/L | 60% (515-347) |
| $29,080 | Career Prize Money | $81,829 |
| 2 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Quinn VS Mensik PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Baez VS Dzumhur PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-1 | |||||
| 6-2 4-6 7-6(5) | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 29 | Games Won | 19 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Miguel-Angel Lopez Jaen Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF | 2-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-6(1) 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-3 0-6 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-0 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-2 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 1-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Niels Desein Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Zizou Bergs
Player
Niels Desein
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve %
56%
(
30 of
54)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
78%
(
14 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
9 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Frederico Gil
Player
Niels Desein
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
30%
(
18 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matteo Martineau
Player
Niels Desein
57%
(
47 of
83)
1st Serve %
59%
(
52 of
88)
14
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
83%
(
39 of
47)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
37 of
52)
36%
(
13 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
31 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
88)
88
Total Points Won
83
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Niels Desein
Player
Hugo Voljacques
65%
(
45 of
69)
1st Serve %
54%
(
40 of
74)
9
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
6
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
31 of
40)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
24 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
30 of
74)
75
Total Points Won
68
|
2-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Niels Desein
Player
Joshua Paris
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve %
63%
(
25 of
40)
5
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
7 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
49
Total Points Won
22
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Benjamin Lock
Player
Niels Desein
58%
(
60 of
103)
1st Serve %
67%
(
57 of
85)
10
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
5
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
38 of
57)
42%
(
18 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
41%
(
42 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
38 of
85)
99
Total Points Won
89
|
4-6 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gleb Sakharov
Player
Niels Desein
53%
(
26 of
49)
1st Serve %
49%
(
35 of
71)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
25 of
35)
78%
(
18 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
12 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
32 of
71)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Niels Desein
Player
Jonas Merckx
61%
(
50 of
82)
1st Serve %
58%
(
45 of
77)
8
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
8
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
39%
(
32 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
30 of
77)
80
Total Points Won
79
|
6-4 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Niels Desein
Player
Pedro Gabriel Rodrigues
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve %
64%
(
32 of
50)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
62
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Christopher Diaz-Figueroa
Player
Niels Desein
59%
(
20 of
34)
1st Serve %
71%
(
25 of
35)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
75%
(
15 of
20)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
35%
(
12 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
40
Total Points Won
29
|
6-2 2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 54% (331/281) | Win/Loss | 60% (515/347) |
| 54% (756/657) | Sets Win/Loss | 58% (1152/840) |
| 51% (6786/6398) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (10010/8718) |
| 59% (68/48) | Hard Win/Loss | 60% (127/83) |
| 54% (258/222) | Clay Win/Loss | 59% (202/141) |
| 33% (5/10) | Indoor Hard W/L | 62% (177/108) |
| 0% (0/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 38% (9/15) |
| 0.02 | Aces Per Game | 0.16 |
| 129 | Aces Total | 1501 |
| 0.01 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.12 |
| 60 | Total Double Faults | 1052 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 512.54 | Average Opponent Rank | 584.56 |
| 63% (1629/2602) | 1st Serve % | 61% (13052/21332) |
| 65% (1059/1629) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (9284/13052) |
| 48% (466/973) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (3933/8280) |
| 37% (83/224) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (832/1976) |
| 37% (923/2479) | Return Points Win % | 39% (8144/21027) |
| 45% (5/6) | Slam W/L | 30% (8/19) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 45% (10/12) | Main Tour W/L | 38% (13/21) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 52% (74/69) | Challenger W/L | 45% (107/130) |
| 56% (242/194) | Futures W/L | 69% (387/176) |
| 54% (326/604) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (508/845) |
| 33% (1/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 33% (2/6) |
| 52% (85/165) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (150/280) |
| 50% (95/191) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (149/275) |
| 84% (340/286) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (485/419) |
| 16% (340/54) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (485/66) |
| 17% (271/45) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 25% (376/94) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
